Quasi Judicial Meaning – Unlock the Term with Details
Published: June 17, 2025
Have you ever heard the term quasi judicial and wondered what quasi judicial meaning? Don’t worry—you’re not alone!
It’s a term often used in government, law, and public services, and while it might sound a bit complex, the idea behind it is quite simple.
In this blog, we’ll explain the quasi-judicial meaning in a way that’s easy to understand.
We’ll also look at how it’s used, where it comes from, and share examples to help you get a clear idea.
So, whether you’re a student, preparing for exams, or just curious, this guide is for you!
What Does Quasi-Judicial Mean?
The term “quasi-judicial” might sound complicated, but it’s quite simple once you break it down.
Let’s start with the word “quasi.” It comes from Latin and means “almost” or “resembling.”
The word “judicial” relates to courts, judges, and legal decision-making.
So when you put them together, “quasi-judicial” means “almost judicial”—or something that acts like a court, but isn’t an actual court.
In other words:
A quasi-judicial body or action is not a part of the judiciary, but it has some of the powers and functions of a judge or court.
These bodies can conduct hearings, examine evidence, listen to both sides of a dispute, and then make decisions, just like a judge would.
Key features of quasi-judicial bodies:
They follow fair procedures (but less formal than courts).
- The government usually sets them up to solve specific types of issues.
- Their decisions can sometimes be challenged or appealed in a higher court.
- They are meant to be impartial and neutral.
Example to Understand It Better:
Let’s say you have a complaint about your electricity bill. Instead of going straight to a court, you might approach a consumer forum or the electricity regulatory commission.
These bodies listen to your complaint, review the facts, and then decide what’s fair. They’re not judges, but they still settle disputes. That’s quasi-judicial power in action!
Definition and Examples of Quasi-Judicial Meaning
Definition of Quasi-Judicial
A quasi-judicial body or function refers to a non-judicial authority (not a court) empowered by law to make legal decisions.
These bodies can investigate facts, hold hearings, listen to both parties, and make rulings, much like a judge would in a court of law.
In simple words, quasi-judicial means “acting like a judge but not being a judge or a court.”
These decisions often affect the rights of people or organizations and are legally binding, though they can be challenged in actual courts if needed.
Key Characteristics:
- Decision-making power similar to that of a court.
- Hearings are conducted with fairness and neutrality.
- Not part of the traditional judiciary system.
- Often more flexible and quicker than regular courts.
- Can issue fines, licenses, or rulings, depending on the law.
Examples of Quasi-Judicial Bodies and Situations
- Consumer Disputes Redressal Forums (Consumer Courts): If you buy a faulty product and don’t get help from the seller, you can file a complaint here. These forums listen to both sides and give a decision, just like a court, but quicker and simpler.
- Election Commission of India: When it decides on disputes related to elections (like deciding if a candidate broke the rules), it acts in a quasi-judicial manner.
- Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT): If someone disagrees with how much tax they owe, they can approach this tribunal. It listens to arguments from both sides and decides fairly.
- Human Rights Commissions: They can hold inquiries into human rights violations, call witnesses, and give recommendations—functions that resemble judicial duties.
- Railway Claims Tribunal: Handles claims related to rail accidents, loss of luggage, or delayed refunds.
Real-Life Example
Imagine a housing society member files a complaint that the builder didn’t deliver what was promised. Instead of going to court, they go to the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA).
RERA holds a hearing, examines the documents, listens to both parties, and gives a decision. That’s a perfect example of quasi-judicial action.
History and Word Origin of “Quasi-Judicial Meaning”

To understand the full meaning of “quasi-judicial,” it’s helpful to know where the term actually comes from and how it has evolved over time.
Word Origin
The word “quasi-judicial” is made up of two parts:
“Quasi” – This is a Latin word that means “as if,” “almost,” or “resembling.”
In English, “quasi” is often used as a prefix to show something that acts like or is similar to something else, but is not exactly the same.
Example: Quasi-official, quasi-governmental, quasi-scientific.
“Judicial” – This comes from the Latin word judicium, which means “judgment” or “decision.” It refers to courts, judges, or the process of law.
So, quasi-judicial means “almost like judicial” or “having the appearance or function of a judge or court, but not being one.”
Historical Background
The concept of quasi-judicial bodies developed as governments became more complex and started handling a wide range of public issues.
Traditional courts couldn’t manage everything efficiently, especially in areas that required technical or specialized knowledge.
That’s why many countries started setting up administrative tribunals, commissions, and boards during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. These bodies were granted limited judicial powers to:
- Solve disputes
- Enforce rules
Make legal decisions in specific areas (like tax, elections, or consumer rights)
In India, quasi-judicial authorities became more prominent after independence, especially with the introduction of regulatory bodies like the Election Commission, Consumer Forums, and Tribunals under different Acts passed by Parliament.
Over time, the idea of “quasi-judicial power” has become an essential part of public administration, allowing specialized legal decisions to be made outside the regular court system—but still with fairness and legality.
Why the Term Became Important
- It separates judicial authority from administrative power, but allows them to work together.
- It helps resolve disputes efficiently in sectors like housing, electricity, taxation, and education.
- It ensures justice is delivered faster and more affordably for people.
Uses of the Word “Quasi-Judicial”
The word “quasi-judicial” is widely used in the fields of law, government, public administration, and policy-making.
It’s not something you’ll hear in casual conversation, but it’s very important in formal and legal contexts. Here’s how and where the term is commonly used:
- Government and Regulatory Bodies
One of the most common uses of “quasi-judicial” is to describe the powers of regulatory authorities. These bodies are not courts, but they are given legal power to settle disputes, issue judgments, or make decisions within their area of responsibility.
Examples:
- Consumer Dispute Redressal Commissions
- Electricity Regulatory Commissions
- Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA)
- Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
These bodies perform quasi-judicial functions when they conduct hearings, examine evidence, and pass binding decisions.
- Legal Documents and Court Rulings
Courts often refer to a body or authority as “quasi-judicial” in their judgments or legal opinions. It helps distinguish these entities from formal courts while still acknowledging that they have judicial-like powers.
- Administrative and Public Policy Discussions
In discussions related to public administration, governance reforms, or justice delivery systems, the term is used to show how certain authorities can act like courts for specific purposes.
For example:
A policy paper may suggest empowering a quasi-judicial authority to handle environmental violations.
Discussions about improving access to justice may recommend more quasi-judicial tribunals instead of overburdening courts.
- Education and Academic Writing
In fields like law, political science, and public administration, students and researchers often use the term “quasi-judicial” to describe the structure and functions of different government authorities.
- Corporate and Organizational Governance
Some internal grievance redressal mechanisms in large organizations or institutions may be described as quasi-judicial in nature if they follow formal procedures, ensure fairness, and give reasoned decisions, similar to a court.
FAQs
“Quasi-judicial” means something that acts like a court or judge but is not a real court. It can make legal decisions and solve disputes in certain areas.
No, it is not a court. But it has limited powers to conduct hearings, review facts, and make decisions similar to how a court does.
Examples include the Consumer Court, RERA, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Election Commission (in some cases), and Human Rights Commissions.
Yes. If someone is not happy with a quasi-judicial decision, they can usually appeal in a regular court for further review.
They help people get faster and more affordable justice in specific fields without the long process of regular courts.
Conclusion
In simple terms, quasi-judicial means “almost like a judge”. It refers to authorities or bodies that are not actual courts, but they can make legal decisions, hold hearings, and solve disputes, just like a court does.
These bodies play a big role in delivering quick and fair justice in areas like consumer complaints, taxes, real estate, and more.
They help reduce the burden on regular courts and make legal help more accessible to common people.
Understanding the meaning and use of “quasi-judicial” is helpful if you’re interested in law, government, or how justice works in everyday life.
Extra Points on Quasi-Judicial Meaning
- Not a real court, but works like one: Quasi-judicial bodies don’t have all the powers of a court, but they still make fair decisions based on law.
- Faster and less expensive than regular courts: They usually solve problems more quickly and with fewer formalities, which saves time and money for people.
- Specialized knowledge: These bodies are created for specific areas like tax, electricity, real estate, etc., so they have experts who understand the subject well.
- Can be challenged in real courts: If someone is not satisfied with a quasi-judicial decision, they can often appeal in a higher court.
- Ensures justice for common people: Many people who can’t afford long legal battles in big courts get relief through quasi-judicial bodies.

- Be Respectful
- Stay Relevant
- Stay Positive
- True Feedback
- Encourage Discussion
- Avoid Spamming
- No Fake News
- Don't Copy-Paste
- No Personal Attacks

- Be Respectful
- Stay Relevant
- Stay Positive
- True Feedback
- Encourage Discussion
- Avoid Spamming
- No Fake News
- Don't Copy-Paste
- No Personal Attacks